How right Kalev Leetaru is on Wikipedia’s decision to ban The Daily Mail as a source.
This decision, he concludes, was made by a cabal of 50 editors based on anecdotes.
I’ve stated before on this blog how Wikipedia is broken, the abusive attitude of one of its editors, and how even luminaries like the late Aaron Swartz and Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger chose to depart. It’s just taken three years or more for some of these thoughts to get picked up in a more mainstream fashion...
Fifty editors at Wikipedia ban Daily Mail based on some anecdotes
Posted by lyceum under Social MediaFrom http://jackyan.com 2653 days ago
Made Hot by: logistico on February 18, 2017 11:52 pm
Who Voted for this Story
-
lyceum
-
bockmary7
-
blogexpert
-
thelastword
-
leonesimmy
-
mikehartman1
-
LoopLooper
-
justretweet
-
thecorneroffice
-
AmyJordan
-
JoshRed
-
advertglobal
-
Digitaladvert
-
logistico
-
brutusreportblogspot
-
2011tax
-
eScoutRoom
-
ISMagazine
-
FastSwings
-
2010Taxes
-
2012Taxes
-
Steve2014Taxes
-
2012tax
-
GotFreeBusinessCards2
-
2013Taxes
-
tiroberts
-
Frank_Fiedler
-
erikemanuelli
-
lisadavis09
Subscribe
“You are most welcome Gaurav....”
“transition plan is the first thing to start. Thank for sharing this...”
“I have been using Picuki, and other tools. But, I was not aware about IG...”
“I am not into Google Sites. I still and always prefer WordPress. Easy to...”
“Semrush is changing. And, I am following the path....”
Comments
2647 days ago